home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- The Secrets Behind Windows
- by Michael J. Miller
- courtesy of PC Magazine
-
- Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? That was
- the question posed in the old radio show "The Dark Shadow."
-
- Today the question is: Who knows what secrets lurk in
- the hearts of Windows programmers? In its worst form, this
- question was raised by the New York Post, which
- devoted its April 20, 1992, front page to the "Pro-
- gram of Hate" -Microsoft Windows 3.1. If you choose the
- WingdingSS TrueType font in Windows and type "NYC," you'll
- see a poison symbol, a Star of David, and a thumbs-up
- symbol. Some people interpreted this as an anti-Semitic
- message-; and New York's most zealous tabloid seemed to
- agree. In case you weren't in New York that day, let me
- just say you'd be amazed at the intensity of the
- overreaction.
- There are more than a few flaws in the theory
- reported by the media. First of all, Wingdings is not
- designed to be typed, in as usual. The font is a collec-
- tion of symbols you can insert in your documents
- as simple gaphic elements. Far from a new idea, it
- follows in the grand tradition of Zapf Dingbats and
- other symbol fonts- I don't believe that symbol fonts
- mean anything, and Microsoft strongly denies that
- there are any hidden messages in Windows 3.1. More
- than anything, the incident reflected the gap between
- the growing universality of computer use and com-
- puter illiteracy in the mass media. More to the point,
- people seem to misunderstand the simple statistics
- behind the issue. It's very easy to read
- meanings into combinations of symbols. That
- doesn't mean such meanings are there. If symbols
- are assigned-in no particular order-to 220 possible keystroke
- assignments, you can be certain that many common combinations
- of letters will map to combinations of symbols that someone,
- somewhere, will consider meaningful. This is particuarly
- true when you include symbols that many people will find
- useful, such as those representing Christianity, Judaism and
- Islam.
- If you're curious, goto your Windows wordprocessor, change
- the font to Wingdings, and type the whole character set.
- It all looks pretty logical-you won't notice any obvious
- malicious pattern. I'm more inclined to believe that anything
- you read into the pattern of symbols probably says more
- about you than about the font. After all, you can write a hate
- letter using any word processor.
-
- SEE FOR YOURSELF
-
- (The Wingdings controversy was blown out of proportion, but that
- doesn't mean that Windows isn't hiding something. It is.
- Try this: Go into the Program Manager in Windows 3.1 and open
- the About box under the Help menu. On the screen, you will see
- the Windows flag. With the Ctrl and Shift keys held down,
- double click on the green section of the flag, then click
- on OK to close the box. The first time you do this nothing
- happens. Try it again, but don't click on OK right away.
- This time, a small Windows flag will appear and start to
- wave; now click on OK to close. The third time you go
- through the steps, a little box will pop up with an image
- of a person beside a list of the members of the Windows development
- team. The list of names will scroll by. (The names take a while to
- parade by; it was a big team. Just click on OK to escape.)
- Go through this process of opening and double-clicking on the flag
- three times for each color of the flag you click on, you'll see a
- different person. The fourth images are of Bill Gates, Microsoft.
- vice president Brad Silverberg (who headed the Windows team),
- Microsoft execututive vice president Steve Ballmer, and the Windows 3.1
- team mascot, a teddy bear. (Don't ask.)
-
- Hidden messages are also lurking beneath many Windows
- applications. Open a document in Word for Windows 2.0, go to the
- Record Macro command under the Tools menu, and create a
- new macro called SPIFF. Go back to Tools and hit Stop Recorder,
- then Macro. Select SPIFF from the list of macro names and click
- on Edit. Delete the Sub Main and End Sub commands that
- Word automatically puts in. Close and save the blank macro,
- then go to the program's About box and click on the Word icon.
- You'll see six little men run out, followed by a WordPerfect
- monster-Word's biggest competitor. The little men start to panic,
- then squash the monster using the Word icon. They all cheer, and the
- About box changes to an elaborate scrolling list of the Word for Win-
- dows team. It's a little belligerent, but that's Microsoft's style.
- If you use Lotus's Ami Pro 2.0 for Windows, try this. Goto the
- About box under the Help menu and hold down the Shift, Ctrl, and Alt
- keys. Press F7, then type the letters S, P, A, M followed by
- the last number in the Available Memory display and the third from
- the last number in that display. Then release the Shift, Ctrl, and Alt
- keys. Tiny photo images of the Ami Pro developers along with their
- names invade the entire screen and start to float around. Click on the
- faces one by one and they'll disappear. One face, however, won't
- disappear but turns into The King (an Elvis look-alike). The
- unofficial explanation is that you can't kill the King because he's already
- dead. It's fun, and you can get out of it just by hitting Esc the key.
-
- PC MAGAZINE CONTEST
- Those are just three of the many secret screens that have found a life
- inside windows programs. If you have one to share send me the instructions.
- PC Magazine T-shirts go to those who submit the best of the bunch in an
- upcoming column.
- Why do we see these secret screens in so many products?
- Don't the programmers have anything better to do with their time? The
- answer is that the screen themselves may be secret, but the message isn't.
- For most great software developers, creating a program isn't a job. it's a
- way of life. As a result, they want their names-or their faces to be part
- of the program. Not in the documentation, but in the code itself.
- We all want software created by people who are proud enough of their work
- to want their names on it.
-
-